Monday, 21 Oct 2019

You are here

Steroid Sparing Effects of Methotrexate and Mycophenolate in Uveitis

Patients with noninfectious uveitis (intermediate, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis) often require high dose corticosteroids and therefore may need steroid-sparing DMARD therapy. The FAST study investigated the corticosteroid-sparing effect of methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil in adults with noninfectious uveitis.

The First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial enrolled 216 patients with active noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis and they were randomized to either oral methotrexate, 25 mg weekly (n = 107), or oral mycophenolate mofetil, 3 g daily (n = 109). The primary outcome was treatment success at 6 months, which was defined as having control of inflammation in both eyes, no more than 7.5 mg prednisone daily and less than or equal to 2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1%, and no treatment failure after 12 mos.

With nearly 90% of patients completing follow-up through 6 months, treatment success was seen in 66.7% of methotrexate group compared with 57.1% in the mycophenolate group, a difference that was not statistically significant.

However, in those with posterior uveitis or panuveitis, treatment success was achieved in 74% on methotrexate versus 55% on mycophenolate (P = .02).

Intermediate uveitis was more likely to respond to mycophenolate (64%) compared to methotrexate (33.3%) treated patients (P = .07; P for interaction = .004).

Elevated liver enzymes were the most common nonserious laboratory adverse event, occurring in 14 patients (13.0%) in the methotrexate group and 8 patients (7.4%) in the mycophenolate group.

JAMA reports that both mycophenolate and MTX demonstrated steroid sparing effects in the majority of patients.  While there were no overall differences in treatment success (efficacy plus corticosteroid-sparing) intermediate uveitis tended to respond better to mycophenolate, while posterior and panuveitis responded better to MTX.

Disclosures: 
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Rheumatologists' Comments

MTX continues to be an amazing medication
MTX continues to be an amazing medication

More Like This

ACR Responds to CY2020 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule

Rheumatology leaders commend CMS for proposing E/M code changes and urge agency to make additional changes to final rule.d

Parenteral Out-Performs Oral Weekly Methotrexate

A systematic review in PLOS suggests that parenteral MTX therapy is more successful than oral MTX in achieving optimal disease activity control. 

ACR Survey Shows Half of Patients Cannot Afford Treatments

Americans living with rheumatic disease face significant healthcare challenges, according to a national patient survey released this week by the American College of Rheumatology. More than 1,500 U.S. adults living with rheumatic disease responded to the survey, which asked a range of questions related to healthcare access, affordability and lifestyle. Key findings include that even though 90 percent of respondents reported having health insurance coverage, nearly 60 percent said they had difficulty affording their medications or treatments in the past year.

Medical Use of Cannabis in 2019

JAMA has published an overview of cannabis and its medical uses. Although nearly 10% of cannabis users in the United States report using it for medicinal purposes, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of medical cannabis for most conditions for which its use is advocated or advised. Nevertheless, there is increase in favoring the public availability of cannabis, largely for the management of more than 50 medical conditions.

Vitamin D Supplements Fail to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes - DUH!

A NEJM report shows that the use of vitamin D3 supplementation (4000 IU per day) in those without diabetes or vitamin D deficiency failed to significantly lower risk of type 2 diabetes (compared to placebo).

The rational for this report included observational data showing an association between a low blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and the risk of type 2 diabetes.